Way back in January at CES, Oakley teamed up with Intel to unveil Radar Pace, a set of smart sunglasses designed to help improve your workouts. Now the company is finally set to release the gadget, which launches on October 1 for $49.
The Pace Radar looks like a pretty standard pair of high-end sporty replica sunglasses with one key difference. Oakley replica includes a detachable earbud, which grips onto to the sunglasses using a bendable arm. It also features three built-in microphones so you can ask for feedback throughout your workout and respond to questions.
The design is sweat-resistant and packs a battery that lasts 4 hours if you listen to music (6 hours without music). There’s also a built-in touchpad for quickly skipping between tracks.
Pace Radar can also track your distance and even incorporate your heart rate into its analysis, but it doesn’t pack any of the sensors to actually take those measurements. Instead, it connects to your smartphone for GPS data. It can also sync with an attached smartwatch or fitness tracker.
Once you’re ready to run (or jog or bike) cheap Oakley sunglasses will act as a virtual workout coach. The Pace system will offer updates on your speed and stride, along with ways to improve. You can also ask for information directly. When you’re ready to stop just say that you’re finished, and if you haven’t completed the planned workout the cheap sunglasses will urge you to keep going.
If you’re a die-hard runner or biker looking for some extra encouragement this could be a fun option. The price seems a little high considering that it still relies on other connected gadgets to actually gather your data, but it’s possible that future versions of Pace Radar could bring costs down, add extra sensors or both.
Smith’s PivLock has been around for some time now and through various iterations has revolved around the ‘PivLock’ lens changing system.
Instead of relying on the arms snapping on with a hooked structure on the lens, like most other frameless replica sunglasses, Smith uses a small egg-shaped nub that goes through a hole in the lens and allows the arms to pivot down and lock on. Utilizing this this two-structure system for swapping lenses not only means less pressure is put on the lens, but also less wear on the arms from being continually snapped on and off.
The latest-edition Arena Max V2’s lens is quite big, measuring 48mm tall – that’s 2mm smaller than cheap Oakley’s Radar EV – and is totally frameless. But they still weigh in at a feathery 29g. With no frame to get in the way, the lens extends far past your field of vision both up and down, meaning that when tucked in an aero time trial position, you’re not peering over the top of the lens.
Smith has printed the logo on the upper left corner of the PivLock lenses for some time now and we’d previously complained you could see it. From this tester’s persepctive at least, it seems Smith has rectified this issue with the bigger lens – the logo was nowhere to be seen during the test period.
The large curved lens provides for distortion free vision, and in fact is one of the clearest we’ve used. Smith includes three lenses in the package: Red Sol-X Mirror, Ignitor and clear. The Red Sol-X Mirror is quite dark, only allowing for 11% visible light transmission, and was my go-to for just about every road ride. It kept my eyes comfortable in full sun, while also performing surprisingly well when the light got flat.
With considerably more visible light transmission than the Red Mirror lens, we found the Ignitor lens at 32% VTL best suited to the varied light conditions of mountain biking.
If you’ve ever spent any time around a ski slope on a cloudy day, you’ll hear people in the lift line talking about their lens choice and lamenting that they didn’t wear a ‘rose’ lens. This is because for years, ski coaches have told their athletes that a rose lens helps to bring out contrast and some depth perception when the light is flat – something that my experience through years of running gates proved true.
The Ignitor is a rose base lens with silver reflective coating. I found that, like a rose goggle lens, in the trees I didn’t need to strain my eyes to pick out roots, rocks and other obstacles in the shadows, or when the contrast was lacking. It also provided enough tint to keep my eyes comfortable in full sun.
Though it’s not something I used a whole lot, the clear lens was reserved for riding in darkness. It’s not an essential piece of kit, but I was glad it was included.
All three lenses get hydrophobic coating front and back, meaning rain will bead off the outside and sweat will also bead and run off the inside of the lens. This coating also helps repel oil (like from fingerprints) allowing it to be wiped off rather than smudging on the lens.
Like most other performance Oakley sunglasses with long straight arms, the tips do overlap with some helmet retention systems. As this is commonplace it’s not a major cause for complaint – but when the helmet moves, so will your sunglasses. Similarly to the PivLock V2 Max, the arms also sit quite high and will make contact with some helmets as a result of riding-related jiggles, which can cause the glasses to slowly work their way down your nose.
That said, the nose pads and temple tips are made from tacky rubber, which helps keep them planted on your face.
Unique to the PivLocks is the adjustable nose piece – though it’s not adjustable in the sense you might expect. Instead of the actual nose pads moving in or out individually, the rubber pads slide up and down bringing the pads together or pushing the apart respectively.
It’s only a few millimetres but it does make a difference in where the lens sits on your face. I found the lower position was most comfortable, allowing the replica glasses to accommodate this tester’s front facing aerofoil (aka sizeable nose).
When you purchase the PivLock Arena Max, Smith givess you three lenses, a hard case and microfibre bag. Considering the Smith lenses are some of the clearest we’ve used, we reckon the PivLocks demonstrate fantastic value, especially considering a pair of basic Radar EVs costs almost the same and you don’t even get a spare lens. Oh, and they’re pretty good looking too.
— Take a backward look at the eyewear that defined an era
The M Frame was when Oakley got serious. Five years earlier its groundbreaking cycling eyewear, the Factory Pilot Eyeshades, had looked cool, crazy, kooky, geeky even.
It had taken a maverick like Greg LeMond to bring them to the conservative pro peloton of 1985. Oakley was a small, Californian startup at the time. The following year virtually every rider in the peloton was begging replica Oakley founder Jim Jannard for a pair. So when Oakley introduced the M Frame in 1990 it meant business.
It could be because the M Frame is inextricably linked with Lance Armstrong, or because Oakley’s European rivals went for a completely different style of replica sunglasses, but from 1990 until 2006 — the year after Armstrong retired (the first time) — the M Frame was the inscrutable, menacing face of cycling.
Perhaps the best-loved illustration of the cheap Oakley M Frame’s putative power over its bug-eyed Euro competitors was when Armstrong issued ‘the Look’ from behind his blue iridium lenses directly into the white Rudy Project Tayos of Jan Ullrich at the foot of Alpe d’Huez in 2001.
It didn’t matter that we couldn’t see the eyes of the two riders — the expressions their respective eyewear lent them told the whole story. The robot had mercilessly crushed the irritating bug and was now on the rampage, destroying everything in its path.
Magic and mystery
The M Frame was originally called ‘Mumbo’ in 1989 but all but the first letter of the name was deleted after clothing company Mambo objected. Simply being known as ‘M’ was far more effective as it turned out.
Consumers wondered whether ‘M’ referred to the shape of the frame, whether it had something to do with the fictional head of MI6 in the Bond films or simply accepted it as the call sign of the most desirable fake glasses in cycling.
Oakley had hit upon a winning and timeless formula: a minimal but tough and flexible strip that sat at eyebrow level so as not to obscure vision, into which snapped an equally tough polycarbonate lens with high optical quality that could be swapped in a matter of seconds.
Oakley’s rubbery Unobtainium material was used for the ‘earsocks’ and nose bridge. The M Frame was flawless.
In 2007 Oakley outlet finally unveiled the successor to the M Frame: the Radar. For many its over-engineered appearance was a backward step. However, Oakley replica had a large enough following that the Radar was accepted.
What’s for certain is that a look from behind a pair of Radars, or even the latest retro-looking Jawbreakers, will never equal a look from M Frames.
While best and the brighest athletes from around the world are in the spotlight at the Olympics to get their shine on, they’ve found shade in the form of special glasses made by Oakley.
The Green Fade replica sunglasses utilize Oaklely’s Prizm lens technology, which fine-tunes the individual wavelengths of color to sharpen vision and reveals subtle detail that would otherwise be unseen. It’s handy for the average person, but especially useful for an athlete who has to pay close attention to their surroundings.
The lenses essentially create an artificial color spectrum—a version of the world where everything is just a little clearer—that is designed to improve performance. For example, beach volleyball players may be able to better spot the white of the ball against the light blue sky so they can ensure they are in position for the next hit.
The effect is acheived by modifying the wavelengths as they pass through the lenses. Specific dyes are used in the polycarbonate lenses to create tints that make it possible to change the transparency and opacity of each wavelength.
While the concept behind the fake sunglasses make sense, and a similar version of the lens used in ski and snowboard goggles created a frenzy at that 2014 Winter Olympics, there’s not a ton of scientific evidence to suggest typical tinted shades create an improvement in performance.
One study conducted by the Pacific University College of Optometry found some lenses to offer improvements in vision and that athletes prefer the tinted shades to clear lenses. But other studies, including one from researchers at the University of Ballarat’s Human Movement and Sports Science, found no actual improvement in performance in athletes wearing tinted glasses.
Of course, none of the lenses tested in the studies were the super specialized Green Fade glasses. It’s possible Oakley’s attention to detail in the replica glasses produce better results. And there’s something to be said for the placebo effect of making athletes feel more comfortable with the glasses on.
The shades aren’t just for Olympians, either; while the specialized version of the lenses can cost over $10, you can get your hands on glasses utilizing Prizm technology if you have $20 to spend. Just don’t expect to get Olympic-level performance during whatever task you wear them for.
Oakley continues to downsize its Orange County base, with a reduction in its staff expected as several key operations shift to join parent company Luxottica Group in Ohio, New York and Italy.
The company – founded 41 years ago by Jim Jannard and known for its replica sport sunglasses and goggles – has been steadily shrinking over the past year as Luxottica, based in Milan, prepares to integrate several Oakley outlet uk divisions outside of California.
Luxottica, which bought Oakley for $2.1 billion in 2007, plans to move Oakley’s retail operation to its offices in Mason, Ohio, by the end of the year, the company said. The group’s New York office will manage all wholesale operations, and the Milan office will be in charge of marketing.
Oakley’s research and development, design, engineering and manufacturing departments will remain in Foothill Ranch, along with a number of administrative positions.
Oakley said Wednesday that 15-20 percent of its Foothill Ranch workforce would be affected. Afterward, the company will employ roughly 2,000 people in the county and at an Encinitas office.
“Last year, we announced the further integration of cheap Oakley into Luxottica, allowing the brand to better leverage Luxottica’s resources, distribution channels, and manufacturing and market power,” a Luxottica spokesperson said in a statement. “This final stage of the integration will line Oakley up with the rest of Luxottica in terms of channels, functions and geographies, simplifying everything from decision-making to execution.”
Oakley’s apparel, footwear and accessories products will be “simplified,” the company said in the earnings call.
Sales have been struggling, the company stated, leading to a decrease in wholesale revenue of 1.6 percent in North America in the first half of the year compared with the same period a year ago.
Oakley replica in February laid off 76 people in Foothill Ranch. Last summer it cut 159 jobs there and eight in Encinitas, according to filings with the state.
The company also is closing its distribution operation in Ontario. A new distribution center will be built in Atlanta, Luxottica said.
Luxottica also owns Ray-Ban, Vogue Eyewear, Persol, Oliver Peoples and Alain Mikli and has licenses with Giorgio Armani, Burberry, Bulgari, Chanel, Dolce&Gabbana, Ralph Lauren, Tiffany & Co. and more.
In 1980, Oakley outlet released its first performance eyewear in a green hue. Now, 36 years later and just in time for the 2016 Olympics, the company has revisited that iconic green color with its Green Fade Collection.
The limited-edition collection of replica sunglasses – only 100,000 units in eight styles were produced – includes performance styles EVZero Path ($19), EVZero Range ($19), Radar EV Path ($21), Flak 2.0 XL ($19), RadarLock Path ($28) and Jawbreaker ($23), as well as lifestyle products Frogskins ($18) and Crosslink Zero. (For golfers, the Flak 2.0 XL and RadarLock Path are recommended.)
The Green Fade Collection’s EVZero models will be available with the brand’s first dual-iridium lens coating that combines two Prizm lens tints on a single toric shield. The rest of the models will feature replica Oakley Prizm lenses.
Each unit was hand-painted at Oakley’s headquarters in Foothill Ranch, Calif. Fake Oakley athletes Bubba Watson, Javier Gomez Noya (Spain, triathlete), Kerri Walsh (U.S., beach volleyball player) and Richard Murray (South Africa, triathlete) will wear products from the collection, and also were involved in painting some of the frames.
It’s pretty rare nowadays to roll up to a bunch ride or race and not see someone wearing Oakley replica sunglasses. Between the Radar, Radarlock (and XL), Radar EV and Jawbreakers, Oakley frames are donned by a huge number of cyclists around the world.
In addition to looking great (ok, maybe not the Jawbreakers), they offer fantastic visual clarity, durable construction, and best-in-class comfort. However, all of these frames have something in common which obscures the view – the frame itself.
Oakley’s latest release the EVZero does away with the frame completely, and is designed for totally unobstructed vision. Claimed to be ‘the lightest performance sunglasses in history’, the new EVZero is a redesigned version of the the Sub Zero which was released in the 90’s.
Available in two lens shapes, Path and the slightly larger Range, both feature lightweight slender earsocks made from replica Oakley’s ‘O-Matter’, and no-slip ‘Unobtainium’ rubber on the nosepiece and temple tips to keep the glasses securely attached to your face. Unfortunately the lens (or arms rather) are fixed, and though I’m not a frequent lens changer, it’s a feature I’d like to see.
The Path lens shape is the smaller of the two, and weighs in at a feathery 22g, making them some of the lightest sports glasses around — lighter than the Spy Daft (28g), Smith Pivlock Arena Max (29g) and long-established roadie favourite the Oakley Radar Path (30g).
Both in fit and size, the EVZero Path is comparable to the Radar EV, with both lenses measuring 50mm. Even being the smaller of the two designs, the Path lens offers full coverage, and I didn’t find myself looking over the top of the lens when tucked in an aero position. Despite the large curved lens, there was no noticeable visual distortion towards the edges.
One of the major complaints I’ve had with cheap Oakley sunglasses in the past is that the long earsocks tend to overlap with some helmets’ retention systems, something EVZero also falls victim to. It’s not a major annoyance, but if your helmet moves so will the glasses.
Even though the lens forms the main structure of the glasses, they feel surprisingly robust, not flexy or cheap like some frameless sunglasses do. I didn’t experience any fogging even in major humidity, which left a few riding buddies flying blind as they took off from a stop light.
Our sample EVZero Path also featured Oakley’s latest Prizm lens technology. Oakley says its Prizm technology was 15 years in development, and each lens is designed to optimize light conditions experienced in a specific sporting environment. While there’s a range of lenses designed for everything from golf to baseball, for cycling there’s a separate lens road and mountain biking.
The Prizm Road lens I tested is claimed to boost road texture, painted lines, and traffic lights, while also enhancing greens and blues. It’s not a huge difference, but I did find vision was sharp, with certain road hazards and painted lines seemed to pop. As you can probably guess, the 20 percent light transmission was a bit dark for low light and night time riding.
Unfortunately, the Road Prizm lens doesn’t perform particularly well on the trail. It may be partially due to the low overall light transmission, but looking through the Road Prizm lens, rocks, roots and other obstacles were harder to pick out, especially in the trees.
Seeing that the lens isn’t swappable, if you’re planning to do much mountain biking or mixed surface riding, the Prizm road lens isn’t the best choice. That said, the EVZero Path is available in non Prizm lens options.
It’s also worth noting Oakley outlet now only applies hydrophobic coating on the outside of its lenses. It’s not a huge issue for most, but the heavier sweaters among us may find this annoying as sweat often smears on the inside of the lens rather than beading and dripping off the bottom.
EV Prizm Range
The bigger of the two lens options, the EVZero Range weighs in two grams heavier than the Path version at 24g. While only 5mm taller than the Path, the Range lens shape surprisingly offered noticeably more coverage. When tucked in the aero position, I could just see the upper edge of the Path lens at the very top of my field of vision, while with the Range lens I couldn’t see a distinguishable edge, even when I strained in an attempt to do so.
As with the Path lens shape, the Range has the same trouble with arms overlapping helmet retention systems, but surprisingly the large lens didn’t tap the brow of any of the helmets I tried them with, like some big sports glasses do.
Our Range tester came equipped with Oakley’s photochromatic lens. With light transmission ranging from 69 – 23 percent, I have yet to find light conditions the lens doesn’t suit.
I’d grab these glasses for my dawn patrol rides, with the lens adjusting its tint as the sun came up, keeping my eyes comfortable the whole time. While the transition isn’t lightning quick, it handles the bright to dark (and vice versa) transition of whipping in and out of the trees on singletrack well.
Over the past two months I’ve been swapping between the EVZero Range and Path, and have ridden them in every light and weather condition you can imagine (on the east coast of Australia that is). I preferred the bigger Range lens shape, as I have extremely sensitive eyes and enjoyed the added coverage, although the larger lens may not suit smaller faces. The versatility of the photochromatic lens was also much appreciated.
By eliminating the frame, Oakley replica has created their widest unobstructed range of view yet. With distortion-free, crisp vision across the entire lens, and plenty of coverage to boot, the lightweight glasses literally disappear on your face, leaving you completely immersed in your environment. With that said, I’m not sure the EVZero is Oakley’s best effort.
The biggest niggle I have with the EVZero is the fixed lens, and I’d happily trade a few grams to be able to swap lenses — especially when it comes to the Prizm lens. As the Prizm lens provides great visual clarity for the environment it’s been designed for, it’s tuned so specifically that once you leave that environment it’s not great.
If you’re one to ride road and mountain bikes and want a Prizm lens, you’ll need a second pair, and at $17 / UK£14 / AU$22 the price may be too much for some. I would have loved to see the Switchlock lens changing system as seen on the discount Oakley Tombstone glasses implemented in the EVZero.
That said, the EVZero is available in non-Prizm and Photochromic lens options, and will cost you $19 / £17 / AU$27 and $16 / £13 / AU$20 respectively.
Overall the Oakley EVZero are a great pair of sports glasses, and if you’re not one to venture away from the tarmac, the Road Prizm lens offers fantastic visual clarity. For those who enjoy a mix of tarmac and trail, and don’t want to buy two pairs I’d say you should should consider a non Prizm or photochromic options.
Replica Sunglasses, like handlebar shape, bibs and shoes are generally a matter of personal preference. With the EVZero, Oakley outlet hopes to make you see the light with its newest minimalist design.
Coming in at a scant 23 grams on the Cyclocross Magazine scale, Oakley says that the EVZero is the company’s lightest frame. Although, the use of the word frame may be a misnoamer as the majority of the design is the lens shield.
The test pair we received offered a pretty versatile tint with great clarity. Our test pair was also the larger of the EVZero options, the Range, while a slightly smaller EVZero Path is also available. Both the EVZero Range and Path share the minimalitst design and gossamer weight as well as cheap Oakley’s Prizm lens technology designed to enhance vision detail.
We’ve been using the EVZero Range regularly, since the Lost & Found gravel race. With the Range’s larger lens, those with high cheek bones may find some contact with the lens. Overall the EVZero Range has become a favorite shade for variable light conditions and long days in the saddle.
The EVZero comes in the aforementioned two lens shield shapes and a bevy of colors, true to Oakley’s style. Stay tuned for a full review.
These new replica sunglasses might just change the way we listen to music on the move forever. The Zungle Panther pairs modern oakley sunglasses design with the latest bone-conduction technology to create a pair of shades through which you can listen to music and make phone calls.
They operate using Bluetooth audio playback, and hands-free calling is possible using the built-in mic. Audio is controlled using a small jog dial, and because the headphones use bone-conduction to transmit audio, they also free up your ears to hear everything your environment has to offer.
As with many bone-conduction devices on the market, battery seems to be a bit of an issue. However, you’ll still get around four hours of music playback before you need to plug them in for an hour to get back to full charge.
The Zungle Panthers are priced at $19 until the Kickstarter campaign ends on July 16, which, for a pair of high-tech replica sunglasses that come with the same lenses as replica Oakley Frogskins, is actually very reasonable. Watch the promo video above.
Seventy percent of the world’s sunglasses are made by the same company—a brand called Luxottica that is responsible for shades from Ray Ban, LenCrafters, Marc Jacobs, Oliver Peoples, Tiffany, Persol, DKNY, Oakley and others. So, splurging on a pair of sunnies is complicated. Why spend hundreds of dollars for a pair of replica sunglasses that the same exact company also makes and sells for under $10?
The key to purchasing a valuable pair is finding unique, high-quality shades from a brand you want to invest in. The following replica sunglasses are classic, historic, or artistic in a way no other brand could replicate, and they have high-quality features that justify the price. Plus, many of these brands fall in the 30 percent that isn’t owned by that sunglass monopoly.
1. Karen Walker Super Duper Strength Sunglasses, $28
For a timeless yet still on-trend look, invest in these round sunglasses by Karen Walker. With strong glare reduction and UV protection, you’ll be happy to have them on super sunny days. And, if “Super Duper Strength” means they won’t break when you sit on them, well, that’s just an added bonus.
2. Etnia Barcelona Basquiat 01, $35
If you’re interested in showcasing a real piece of art on your face, you can do that with Etnia Barcelona’s Jeal-Michiel Basquiat collection inspired by the graffiti artist and painter. We’re big fans of the 01 In This Case, which feature red and blue designs on the stems. The brand also frequently partners with charitable global organizations, making it even more of a company worth investing in.
3. Oliver Goldsmith Grace, $40
Actresses like Audrey Hepburn and Grace Kelly basically invented the chic shaded look, and you can channel it with the Grace sunnies by Oliver Goldsmith. Founded in 1926, London’s Oliver Goldsmith became a household name in the 1950s, thanks to customers like Kelly, Hepburn and, much later, Princess Diana. The company now has a line using archival frames, which includes the Grace. We’re not sure how replica sunglasses could get more valuable.
4. Ray-Ban Aviator Carbon Fibre, $24
As time has proven, aviators will never go out of style, and either will Ray-Ban, which is why you should invest in a pair of their classic aviators. The sturdy shades will last a lifetime—in both style and quality. Splurge on the Carbon Fibre aviators, which are polarized, lightweight and resilient.
5. Prada Blue Gradient Cat Eye, $35
You can’t get more classic when it comes to sunnies than Prada. If you’re looking for a trusted brand with a dash of style, opt for these angular cateyes with 100 percent UV protection. Every girl should have a pair of colored lenses in her collection, and these light blue ones fit the bill.
6. Oakley Mainlink Prizm deep/shallow water sunglasses, $15
Go to a store and try both out before you buy, and compare to other glasses. A lot of guys here will tell you Costa, but I own versions of both and prefer Oakleys… Once you try them on and have your preference, buy the glasses from Ebay, there are reputable sellers that sell for 25-50% off from what the Mall stores or BPS sells them for. Just pay attention to feedback scores.
As for your particular conditions, I would say it sounds like the Oakly Prizm Deep Water Blue would be of most benefit to you. But whichever color you go, I would go Oakley Outlet over Costa. Oakley has a better variety of styles (though this is subjective). Also my Oakley’s stay on my head a lot easier, my Costas slip. The Oakley’s are lighter generally, my Costas weigh down on the bridge of my nose after just an hour drive. Also, if you buy the Oakley Shallow Prizms and find you need the Deep Blue, you can buy just the other lenses and pop them in/out with ease on many Oakley Models (Half Jackets or Flak Jackets).
I viewed the Oakley Prizm Shallow and Deep this spring SideXside with Costa Blue Mirror and Green Mirror polarized (both were the 580Glass). The Costa Blue and the cheap Oakley Prizm Blue were no different to my eyes whatsoever. The Costa Green and the replica Oakley Shallow were similar, with the Costas having a bit more amber and more of a color contrast which wound up being kind of irritating to my eyes after a few minutes.